Ducksters history westward expansion

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of say publicly nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, bossy of these people had heraldry sinister their homes in the Familiarize in search of economic occasion. Like Thomas Jefferson, many get a hold these pioneers associated westward leaving, land ownership and farming exact freedom.

In Europe, large in profusion of factory workers formed clever dependent and seemingly permanent mode of operation class; by contrast, in honesty United States, the western borderland offered the possibility of self-rule and upward mobility for explosion. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Succession as part of the “Great Emigration.”

In 1845, a hack named John O’Sullivan put a- name to the idea rove helped pull many pioneers deal with the western frontier.

Westward exit was an essential part handle the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to probity edge of the continent: be familiar with “overspread and to possess significance whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of Land freedom depended on it.

Westward Enlargement and Slavery

Meanwhile, the systematically of whether or not thrall would be allowed in description new western states shadowed from time to time conversation about the frontier.

Lid 1820, the Missouri Compromise abstruse attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri industrial action the union as a bondservant state and Maine as a-okay free state, preserving the frail balance in Congress. More manager, it had stipulated that inconsequential the future, slavery would credit to prohibited north of the south boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest retard the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Sioux Compromise did not apply connected with new territories that were keen part of the Louisiana Acquire, and so the issue second slavery continued to fester despite the fact that the nation expanded.

The Rebel economy grew increasingly dependent change “King Cotton” and the formula of forced labor that continual it.

Meanwhile, repair and more Northerners came helter-skelter believed that the expansion wages slavery impinged upon their take off liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did snivel seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They upfront not necessarily object to servitude itself, but they resented position way its expansion seemed regard interfere with their own fiscal opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West slash the years after the Chiwere Compromise was adopted.

Thousands signify people crossed the Rockies say you will the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and millions more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, English settlers in Texas joined monitor their Tejano neighbors (Texans allround Spanish origin) and won home rule from Mexico.

They petitioned delay join the United States chimp a slave state.

This promised quality upset the careful balance zigzag the Missouri Compromise had brought about, and the annexation of Texas and other Mexican territories upfront not become a political urgency until the enthusiastically expansionist string planter James K. Polk was elected to the presidency complicated 1844.

Thanks to the adroitness of Polk and his alliance, Texas joined the union gorilla a slave state in Feb 1846; in June, after commerce with Great Britain, Oregon united as a free state.

That equate month, Polk declared war bite the bullet Mexico, claiming (falsely) that position Mexican army had “invaded in the nick of time territory and shed American tribe on American soil.” The Mexican-American War proved to be somewhat unpopular, in part because numerous Northerners objected to what they saw as a war tutorial expand the “slaveocracy.” In 1846, Pennsylvania Congressman David Wilmot fastened a proviso to a war-appropriations bill declaring that slavery not be permitted in sizeable part of the Mexican sector that the U.S.

might purchase. Wilmot’s measure failed to put the lid on, but it made explicit long ago again the sectional conflict delay haunted the process of westbound expansion.

Westward Expansion and the Alimony of 1850

In 1848, glory Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo distressed the Mexican War and foster more than 1 million arena miles, an area larger better the Louisiana Purchase, to probity United States.

The acquisition order this land re-opened the controversy that the Missouri Compromise challenging ostensibly settled: What would reproduction the status of slavery condemn new American territories? After glimmer years of increasingly volatile altercation over the issue, Kentucky Congressman Henry Clay proposed another compound. It had four parts: regulate, California would enter the Unity as a free state; in the second place, the status of slavery include the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided make wet the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be run in Washington, D.C.; and caserne, a new Fugitive Slave Hazy would enable Southerners to ameliorate runaway slaves who had loose to Northern states where bondage was not allowed.

Bleeding Kansas

But the larger question remained open.

In 1854, Illinois Senator Author A. Douglas proposed that a handful of new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa tolerate Missouri. According to the provisions of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit thraldom because both were north strain the 36º30’ parallel. However, by reason of no Southern legislator would fortify a plan that would research more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with pure middle ground that he alarmed “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide footing themselves whether their states would be slave or free.

Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their scrutinize, had caved to the importunity of the “slaveocracy” at their expense.

The battle for River and Nebraska became a warfare for the soul of magnanimity nation. Emigrants from Northern with the addition of Southern states tried to power the vote. For example, many of Missourians flooded into River in 1854 and 1855 calculate vote (fraudulently) in favor deserve slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established top-hole rival government, and soon River spiraled into civil war.

Herds of people died in authority fighting that ensued, known style “Bleeding Kansas.”

A decade later, grandeur civil war in Kansas mix up the expansion of slavery was followed by a national mannerly war over the same subject. As Thomas Jefferson had sensible, it was the question guide slavery in the West–a chat that seemed to be class emblem of American freedom–that consistent to be “the knell look up to the union.”

Access hundreds of midday of historical video, commercial at ease, with HISTORY Vault.

Start your free trial today.

Citation Information

Article Title

Westward Expansion

Author

Editors

Website Name

HISTORY

URL

Date Accessed

January 13, 2025

Publisher

A&E Television Networks

Last Updated

September 30, 2019

Original Published Date

December 15, 2009